1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 246 Cal.App.2d
  5. 246 Cal.App.2d 87 (1966)
 

KLEIN v. ASGROW SEED CO.

Docket No. 11248.

246 Cal.App.2d 87 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 609

BUD KLEIN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ASGROW SEED COMPANY et al., Defendants, Cross-defendants and Appellants; ASSOCIATED FARM SUPPLIES et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

November 2, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mayall, Hurley, Knutsen & Smith, Clarence D. Knutsen, Albert E. Cronin, Jr., and Johnson, Speed & Bamford for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Knox, Goforth & Ricksen and Calvin T. Goforth for Defendants, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Daley, Patridge & Garrett and Richard B. Daley for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

PIERCE, P.J.

Plaintiffs and respondents, Bud Klein, Louis Mersaroli and Reginald Mersaroli, joint venturers engaged in tomato growing, recovered damages in the sum of $14,439.32 against Associated Farm Supplies, a corporation, for breach of warranty in the sale of tomato seed in 1962. Associated, the immediate supplier, on its cross-complaint recovered judgment against its supplier of the seed, Ranch Supply, Inc., which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases