1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 8 Ohio
  5. 8 Ohio Misc. 324 (1966)
 

CASSIDY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY

No. 762.

8 Ohio Misc. 324 (1966)

JOHNSON AND CASSIDY, PETITIONEES, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

United States Supreme Court.

Decided June 20, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stanford Shmukler and Mr. M. Gene Haeberle, for petitioners.

Mr. Norman Heine, for respondent.

Mr. Duane R. Nedrud, for National District Attorneys Association, amicus curiae, by special leave of Court. (Also in Nos. 759, 760 and 584.)

Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 32 O. O. 2d 31, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L. Ed. 2d 977 (1964), and Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 36 O. O. 2d 237, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed 2d 694, should be applied retroactively. We hold that Escobedo affects only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases