1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 93 N.J.
  5. 93 N.J. Super. 232 (1966)
 

MUNOZ REALTY CORP. v. VERONA

93 N.J. Super. 232 (1966)

225 A.2d 594

MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Emil E. Mascia argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Sarcone & Mascia, attorneys; Mr. Peter C. Benz, on the brief).

Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Porter & Hobart, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.

PER CURIAM.

The Law Division adjudged that the provisions of the "1963 zoning ordinance of the defendant Borough insofar as they relate to the plaintiff's lands * * * constitute an arbitrary and unreasonable exercise of the zoning power"; they (plus the 1961 ordinance which said provisions re-enacted) were therefore invalid; consequently "the provisions of the 1957 zoning ordinance * * * insofar as they relate to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases