Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Judicial Department on June 2, 1930. He is here charged with professional misconduct. In 1963 he was retained to defend a civil action for damages in the Supreme Court and was paid a substantial fee in connection therewith. Because of his neglects and defaults a judgment was obtained against his clients. Later in connection with supplementary proceedings an order of contempt was signed and an order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.