The plaintiff's third proposed order is rejected. It is not appropriate to punish the defendant for contempt on the present record.
Not only was a fictitious name used without adequate identification of the judgment debtor (see my opinion herein dated October 24, 1966,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.