1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 29 Wis.2d
  5. 29 Wis.2d 292 (1966)
 

SHEAFFER v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

29 Wis.2d 292 (1966)

SHEAFFER, Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Roy G. Mita and Beatrice Lampert, assistant attorneys general, with whom on the briefs was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief by Honeck, Mantyh & Arndt of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Stewart G. Honeck.

WILKIE, J.

The appellant has conceded most of its case. In its brief the state concedes that since the 1964 change in operation instituted by Sheaffer as set forth in the second cause of action "guarantees to employees the minimum wage of $.95 an hour, it is not challenged by the commission as a violation of the minimum wage law."

Thus, the sole issue remaining on this appeal is whether the facts as set forth in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases