HABBESHAW v. HABBESHAW

No. 10356.

17 Utah 2d 295 (1966)

409 P.2d 972

RUSSELL M. HABBESHAW, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, v. NETA CAROL HABBESHAW, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Utah.

January 18, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Hughes, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Francis C. Lund, Salt Lake City, for respondent.


HENRIOD, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a "judgment" (which in reality only was an order denying a motion for a new trial). Affirmed with costs to respondent.

This appeal is abortive, being from the denial of a motion for a new trial.1

Nonetheless, parenthetically and dictum-wise, we are at a loss to know why, after the full hearings, testimony, findings, conclusions and judgment in which Mrs. Habbeshaw appeared to have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases