FRAGOSA v. EYMAN

No. 2 CA-HC 28.

3 Ariz. App. 308 (1966)

414 P.2d 157

Application of Joe Fragosa for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Joe FRAGOSA, Petitioner, v. Frank A. EYMAN, Warden, et al., Arizona State Prison, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

May 13, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe Fragosa, in pro. per.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., for respondent.


KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, Joe Fragosa, having filed a motion for rehearing from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, raises the question of interpretation and application of A.R.S. § 31-251. This statute provides in part:

"B. Every prisoner faithfully performing such labor and conforming in all respects to the rules, or if unable to work, but complying in all respects to the rules, shall be allowed, if a first offender, from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases