1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 29 Wis.2d
  5. 29 Wis.2d 281 (1966)
 

SCHMIT v. SEKACH

29 Wis.2d 281 (1966)

SCHMIT, Appellant, v. SEKACH and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Donald M. Gorectke of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and John M. Swietlik and Keith I. Johnston of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Swietlik.

GORDON, J.

Negligence of Mr. Sekach as to Lookout.

The principal issue presented upon this appeal is the correctness of the plaintiff's contention that Mr. Sekach was negligent as to lookout as a matter of law. It is urged that the jury's negative answer to that question must be changed. In our opinion, this contention is not meritorious.

The appellant relies principally upon three prior decisions of this court to demonstrate that there was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases