1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 25 A.D.2d
  5. 25 A.D.2d 285 (1966)
 

MTR. OF SCHENLEY IND. v. STATE LIQ. AUTH.

25 A.D.2d 285 (1966)

In the Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc., Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Intervenor-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 19, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry I. Rand of counsel (Samuel S. Allan and Leonard Lipschutz with him on the brief; Weisman, Celler, Allan, Spett & Sheinberg, attorneys), for petitioner.

Emanuel D. Black of counsel (Hyman Amsel, attorney), for respondent.

Charles A. La Torella, Jr., of counsel (Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Philip Weinberg with him on the brief; Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General), for intervenor-respondent.

RABIN, J. P., STEVENS and STEUER, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; EAGER, J., dissents in opinion in which BASTOW, J., concurs.

Per Curiam.

Respondent State Liquor Authority instituted a proceeding against the petitioner, claiming that petitioner violated section 101 (subd. 1, par. [c]) of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and rule 11 of the Rules of the State Liquor Authority (9 NYCRR 86). After a hearing respondent decided that there was such a violation and issued a warning to respondent together with a bond claim for $2,500.

In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases