1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 48 N.J.
  5. 48 N.J. Super. 255 (1966)
 

LICATA v. LUTZ

48 N.J. Super. 255 (1966)

JAMES LICATA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND WILLIAM LARDIERI, PLAINTIFF, v. RICHARD LUTZ, DEFENDANT, AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 5, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William O. Barnes, Jr. argued the cause for defendant-appellant.

Mr. Bernard I. Kramer argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

In 1961 the owner Lardieri and driver Licata, the plaintiffs here, entered into an agreement whereby Licata operated a taxicab under terms almost identical to those described in the case of Naseef v. Cord, decided today. 48 N.J. 317 (1966). The same paragraph 8 appeared in the contract:

"The parties further agree that the provisions of Article II, Chapter 15, Revised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases