1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 245 Cal.App.2d
  5. 245 Cal.App.2d 57 (1966)
 

CAREY v. CUSACK

Docket No. 22687.

245 Cal.App.2d 57 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 244

G.E. CAREY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. WILLIAM B. CUSACK et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

September 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., T.C. Carlstrom, and McCloskey, Wilson, Mosher & Martin for Defendants and Appellants.

Crist, Peters, Donegan & Brenner and John M. Brenner for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

TAYLOR, J.

Plaintiffs, G.E. Carey and C.J. Keenan, real estate brokers (hereafter brokers) recovered in quantum meruit for services rendered in subdividing certain property owned by defendants, William B. and Eileen M. Cusack (hereafter Cusacks). On this appeal, the Cusacks contend that the trial court erred by: 1) denying their motion to dismiss the complaint as the action was barred by the compulsory counterclaim statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases