1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 32 Wis.2d
  5. 32 Wis.2d 266 (1966)
 

MENZL v. MILWAUKEE

32 Wis.2d 266 (1966)

MENZL, d/b/a MENZL'S TOWING SERVICE, Appellant, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Murphy, Shapiro & Gorsky, attorneys, and Carl L. Dubin of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Dubin.

For the respondents there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and Carl F. Kinnel, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Kinnel.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The city contends that the cost of the contract chargeable to city funds is less than $1,000, and, hence, by its terms, the bid ordinance, sec. 7.29, is not mandatorily applicable.

If the contract in question is not subject to the provisions of the bid section, the city is not bound by that type of procedure and even, after determining to invite bids, may reject any or all bids and ask for new bids, or may contract on the basis of reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases