1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 2 Mich.
  5. 2 Mich. App. 288 (1966)
 

OPPENHUIZEN v. WENNERSTEN

Docket No. 406.

2 Mich. App. 288 (1966)

139 N.W.2d 765

OPPENHUIZEN v. WENNERSTEN.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ten Cate, Townsend & Cunningham (Gordon H. Cunningham, of counsel), for plaintiff.

George A. Lievense, for defendant Wennersten.

Shivel, Phelps, Linsey & Strain (Leland D. Phelps, of counsel), for defendant Veneklasen.

HOLBROOK, P.J.

Harry Oppenhuizen, plaintiff-appellee, brought an action against Carl Wennersten, defendant-appellee, and Howard M. Veneklasen, defendant-appellant. Trial before the circuit judge without a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against defendant Wennersten for actual damages because of failure of consideration and against Veneklasen based on fraud for $1,768 actual damages and $500 exemplary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases