PACHANA v. ESPOSITO


91 N.J. Super. 187 (1966)

219 A.2d 627

HELENE PACHANA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT N. ESPOSITO, T/A LONG BRANCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 13, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles M. James argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. James & Addas, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas F. Shebell argued the cause for petitioner-respondent.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

The judge of compensation correctly summarized the evidence as follows:

"* * * the proofs reflect that the petitioner was in the respondent's employ on August 3, 1961 and that during her lunch period a Union Business Agent named Fuerstin appeared on the premises and spoke to the Union Chairlady, Margaret Johnson. Petitioner made inquiry of Mrs. Johnson as to whether or not the business agent had been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases