WHITEHOUSE TRUCKING, INC. v. UNITED STATES

No. C 66-45.

261 F.Supp. 9 (1966)

WHITEHOUSE TRUCKING, INC., a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, W. D.

October 27, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Mone, George, Greek, King & McMahon, Columbus, Ohio, Robert W. Loser, Indianapolis, Ind., for Whitehouse Trucking, Inc.

John W. Mills, Cleveland, Ohio, for Republic Steel Corporation.

Arthur R. Cline, Toledo, Ohio, for Macomber Inc.

R. S. Trigg, Lancaster, Pa., Arthur R. Cline, Toledo, Ohio, for Armstrong Cork Co.

Franklin G. Allen, Chicago, Ill., Arthur R. Cline, Toledo, Ohio, for Fenestra Inc.

Edwin M. Zimmerman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., John H. D. Wigger, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Merle M. McCurdy, U. S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, John G. Mattimoe, Asst. U. S. Atty., Toledo, Ohio, for the United States.

Robert W. Ginnane, Gen. Counsel, Nahum Litt, John E. Faulk, I. C. C., Washington, D. C., for the I. C. C.

Robert A. Sullivan, Frank J. Kerwin, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for Darling Freight, Inc., R. W. Express, Inc., Ringle Express, Inc., Michigan Transportation Co., Severson Transport, Inc., Wenham Transportation, Inc., St. Louis Freight Lines, Inc., B. & L. Motor Freight, Inc., Graff Trucking Co., Inc., Midwest Emery Freight Systems, Inc., Sentle Trucking Co., Joyce Trucking Co., Direct Transit Lines, Inc., and Melton Truck Lines, Inc.

James E. Wilson, Edward G. Villalon, Bruce E. Mitchell, McInnis, Wilson, Munson & Woods, Washington, D. C., Wendland V. Cruey, Toledo, Ohio, for Hennis Freight Lines, Inc.

Before CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge, YOUNG, District Judge, and KLOEB, Senior District Judge.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Whitehouse Trucking Company, filed this action to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring it to cease and desist from transporting certain commodities found not to be authorized by the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity which plaintiff acquired by purchase in 1962. Several plaintiffs and defendants have been permitted to intervene and present arguments.

In 1964 the Commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases