PER CURIAM.
Appellant was tried on three different charges for violations of the uniform narcotic drug law: unlawful possession of narcotic drug; forgery of prescription for narcotic drug and uttering forged prescription for narcotic drug. A jury found him guilty of only one of the charges, i.e., uttering a forged prescription for a narcotic drug in violation of § 398.19(4), F.S.A., and not guilty of the other charges. This appeal is from the judgment and sentence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.