1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 241 Cal.App.2d
  5. 241 Cal.App.2d 19 (1966)
 

HOLLING v. CHANDLER

Docket No. 22216.

241 Cal.App.2d 19 (1966)

50 Cal. Rptr. 219

KATHRYN ROSE HOLLING, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BILL MELVIN CHANDLER, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

March 22, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Campbell, Custer, Warburton & Britton, George A. Strong and Frank Campbell for Defendant and Appellant.

Ralph J. Gampell for Plaintiff and Respondent.

TAYLOR, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is the propriety of an order granting plaintiff's motion for a new trial for errors of law. Plaintiff filed this action for personal injuries sustained in a collision with a vehicle driven by defendant. After the jury brought in a verdict for defendant, the trial court granted plaintiff's motion for a new trial because it had admitted into evidence, for the limited purpose of impeaching plaintiff's expert witness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases