Per Curiam.
The report of the board refers to the active participation by respondent with Riegler in "acts of an undesirable character" and the giving of advice which resulted in undesirable acts by the client.
The board made no finding that money had been given to respondent in trust by Riegler or that the respondent converted to his own use any money to which Riegler was entitled.
There was no finding as to the particular and specific misconduct...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
