1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 30 Wis.2d
  5. 30 Wis.2d 228 (1966)
 

PAVALON v. FISHMAN

30 Wis.2d 228 (1966)

PAVALON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FISHMAN and others, Defendants: THOMAS HOLMES CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Stern & Lee, attorneys, and James F. Stern of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by James F. Stern.

For the respondent there was a brief by Godfrey & Kahn, attorneys, and David M. Hecht and James Ward Rector, Jr., of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Rector.

WILKIE, J.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court had jurisdiction over the person of appellant. This question does not turn, as respondent asserts, on whether appellant may ultimately be held responsible in this action,2 but rather is dependent on whether the requirements of sec. 262.05, Stats., are satisfied. Although respondent contends that the trial court had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases