HENRIOD, Chief Justice:
Appeal from a divorce decree which allegedly was prejudicial as to alimony and property division. Affirmed with costs to respondent.
The respondent filed the divorce action but stood mute as to his alleged grounds therefor, and the divorce ultimately was granted to appellant, Mrs. Frank.
Respondent, married twice before, married appellant, about 10 years his junior. After two or three months the marriage was rocked by bickering...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
