CARLYLE v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO.

42038.

114 Ga. App. 115 (1966)

150 S.E.2d 299

CARLYLE v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided July 14, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Floyd G. Hoard, for appellant.

Davis & Davidson, Jack S. Davidson, for appellee.


FELTON, Chief Judge.

The invoices which are the basis of the account sued upon are not against the defendant retailer, Carlyle, but against the holder of the credit card, Southeastern. There was no evidence of any kind to authorize a finding that the defendant was, by agreement or otherwise, legally bound to pay to the plaintiff the account sued upon, which was an account purportedly owed to the defendant by Southeastern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases