1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 25 A.D.2d
  5. 25 A.D.2d 202 (1966)
 

TREIBER v. LANIGAN

25 A.D.2d 202 (1966)

Andrew C. Treiber et al., Respondents, v. Harles T. Lanigan, as Executive of The County of Oneida, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

March 31, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Robert M. Imrie of counsel), for State of New York, appellant.

William J. Halpin and Richard A. Frye for Charles T. Lanigan and others, appellants.

Tierney, Gannon & Smith (Peter J. Tierney of counsel), for respondents.

WILLIAMS, P. J., BASTOW, GOLDMAN, DEL VECCHIO and MARSH, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

This action was commenced in May, 1965. It sought, among other things, a declaration that the present districting plan for election of Supervisors in Oneida County violated both State and Federal Constitutions. A valid plan was sought and in addition a decree that the term of Supervisors to be elected five months thereafter (Nov., 1965) would expire on December 31, 1966.

After the case was at issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases