1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 91 N.J.
  5. 91 N.J. Super. 135 (1966)
 

ROGOTZKI v. SCHEPT

91 N.J. Super. 135 (1966)

219 A.2d 426

KATHERINE ROGOTZKI, AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DR. SAMUEL S. SCHEPT AND DR. WILLIAM JAY SNYDER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nicholas H. Politan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Krieger, Chodash & Politan, attorneys).

Mr. Robert E. Tarleton argued the cause for respondent Dr. Samuel S. Schept (Messrs. Beggans and Keale, attorneys; Mr. James P. Beggans, of counsel).

Mr. William P. Braun argued the cause for respondent Dr. William Jay Snyder (Mr. J. Emmet Cassidy, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal by leave of court from a Law Division interlocutory order denying their motion to compel defendants to answer certain questions, over 70 in number, put to them in the course of depositions. This is a medical malpractice action wherein the infant plaintiff, suing by her guardian ad litem, seeks damages for permanent injuries caused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases