BAYHAM v. FUNK

No. 1 CA-CIV 121.

3 Ariz. App. 220 (1966)

413 P.2d 279

Alan P. BAYHAM, Appellant, v. David K. FUNK, Arthur L. Funk, and Albert C. Funk, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

April 21, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond Huffsteter, Phoenix, for appellant.

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, by John P. Otto, Phoenix, for appellees.


STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The question presented to this Court is whether a preliminary injunction issued under the authority of Rule 65(e) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, Volume 16 A.R.S., without a bond being required is valid and enforcible?

Charles John Funk has been engaged in litigation and appears to have some financial problems. In Civil Cause No. 129497, he was the plaintiff and the appellees herein were the defendants. In the case at bar the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases