1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 90 N.J.
  5. 90 N.J. Super. 126 (1966)
 

DeCARLO v. CLIFFSIDE PARK

90 N.J. Super. 126 (1966)

216 A.2d 408

DOMINICK DeCARLO AND VISIDOR CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF CLIFFSIDE PARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 17, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph N. Marotta, Jr. argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Paul L. Basile argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Basile & Delchop, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Law Division in this case is reported at 86 N.J.Super. 169 (1965). The borough concedes that its installation of the directional sign in question did not comply with N.J.S.A. 39:4-197(1)(c) or N.J.S.A. 39:4-8. It was therefore guilty of active wrongdoing, for which it is answerable for such damages as may have been proximately caused to the corporate plaintiff in its tavern and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases