1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 182 (1966)
 

NEWTON v. NEWTON

33 Wis.2d 182 (1966)

NEWTON, Appellant, v. NEWTON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 3, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Michael Klein, attorney, and Irving D. Gaines and David A. Saichek of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Gaines.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kersten & McKinnon of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Charles J. Kersten.

BEILFUSS, J.

The plaintiff's major contention on this appeal is that the action of the trial court is equivalent to granting a nonsuit or a demurrer to the evidence at the close of plaintiff's case. At this stage in a trial, plaintiff asserts, the trial court must construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and must give the plaintiff the benefit of favorable inferences that can reasonably be deduced from the credible evidence. Beaudoin v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases