DEVINE v. GOGGIN

No. 38435.

69 Wn.2d 144 (1966)

417 P.2d 606

RICHARD DEVINE, Respondent, v. RUTH D. GOGGIN, as Administratrix, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

August 11, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Splawn & Bounds, for appellant.

Butler & Yencopal (Theodore D. Peterson, of counsel), for respondent.


WARD, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting to the plaintiff a new trial after the return of a verdict by the jury in favor of the defendant.

The six assignments of error made by the defendant require determination of three questions. (1) May a trial court as a matter of law permit a late filing of the motion for new trial? (2) May a trial court as a matter of law, long after the time for filing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases