1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 68 Wn.2d
  5. 68 Wn.2d 117 (1966)
 

OROVILLE CORDELL FRUIT GROWERS, INC. v. MINN. FIRE & MARINE INS. CO.

No. 37781.

68 Wn.2d 117 (1966)

411 P.2d 873

OROVILLE CORDELL FRUIT GROWERS, INC., Respondent, v. MINNEAPOLIS FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

March 3, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarke, Clarke, Albertson & Bovingdon, for appellants.

Guttormsen, Scholfield, Willits & Ager, for respondent.

HILL, J.

Ammonia gas escaped from aluminum tubing in a cold storage room (hereinafter referred to as Room 2) in a warehouse operated by the plaintiff, Oroville Cordell Fruit Growers, Incorporated (hereinafter called Oroville). This caused damage to the 16,608 boxes of apples then in Room 2. There is no question about Oroville being completely compensated for its loss. The controversy is over how that loss is to be apportioned between three insurance companies. Pacific...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases