STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS. CO. v. WALL


92 N.J. Super. 92 (1966)

222 A.2d 282

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LAWRENCE WALL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. RALPH P. PHILLIPS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND LAWRENCE WALL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 5, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nicholas R. Rapuano argued the cause for appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Messrs. Gelman and Gelman, attorneys; Mr. Ervan F. Kushner, of counsel).

Mr. H. Curtis Meanor argued the cause for Ralph P. Phillips et al. and Lawrence Wall (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys for Ralph P. Phillips et al; Messrs Slingland, Bernstein & van Hartogh, attorneys for Lawrence Wall).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.


GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

State Farm brought an action against its assured, Lawrence Wall, for rescission of an automobile liability insurance policy because of Wall's allegedly false and fraudulent misrepresentations. Phillips, Simmons and Washington were injured in an accident for which Wall is allegedly liable. They brought a declaratory judgment action against State Farm and Wall to determine their rights in the afore-mentioned policy. The two actions were consolidated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases