LADUM v. UTILITY CARTAGE, INC.

No. 37740.

68 Wn.2d 109 (1966)

411 P.2d 868

LARRY LADUM, Respondent, v. UTILITY CARTAGE, INC., Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

March 3, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terhune, Schlosstein, Riveland & Elliott (C.F. Schlosstein, of counsel), for appellant.

Cook, Flanagan & Berst (Robert A. Berst, of counsel), for respondent.


OTT, J.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in its determination that the written contract involved was ambiguous. The facts are substantially as follows:

Utility Cartage, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the company), owns a concrete building which had been constructed in two portions. The old portion was built in 1927 (and enlarged in 1946), with concrete mullions 12 inches wide and 8 inches thick, approximately 20 feet...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases