MTR. OF LAIDLAW & CO. v. PAC. INS. CO.


52 Misc.2d 122 (1966)

In the Matter of Laidlaw & Co., Petitioner, v. Pacific Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

October 27, 1966


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy for petitioner. Lord, Day & Lord (John W. Castles, 3rd, of counsel), for respondent.


NATHANIEL T. HELMAN, J.

In this proceeding in the nature of mandamus, brought under section 624 of the Business Corporation Law, petitioner, acting as agent for undisclosed principals, seeks an order directing respondent to furnish it with a list of respondent's stockholders. The issues here presented are (1) whether the fact that the list is sought solely to enable petitioner (for its principals) to solicit sales to it of respondent's stock removes the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases