BLUMENSTOCK v. WEISSMAN


50 Misc.2d 119 (1966)

Hyman Blumenstock et al., Appellants, v. Naomi Weissman et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

March 30, 1966


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hyman Blumenstock, appellant in person, and for Florence Blumenstock and others, appellants. Allen M. Taylor and Martin M. Baxter for respondents.

MARGETT, BRENNER and OLLIFFE, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

In our opinion the holding of the County Court that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to vacate its prior determination would be equally applicable to the Justice's Court had an application for similar relief been directed to that court in the first instance. (See Duran v. Chelsea Exch. Bank, 123 Misc. 158.)

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases