1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. Super. 75 (1966)
 

HINDLE v. MORRISON STEEL CO.

92 N.J. Super. 75 (1966)

223 A.2d 193

ALBERT E. HINDLE, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT, v. MORRISON STEEL CO., A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND SAMUEL HAMELSKY, MAX KRAFCHIK AND JOHN D. WAIT, DEFENDANTS CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas James Tumulty argued the cause for defendant-appellant-cross-respondent (Messrs. Spritzer & Spritzer, attorneys).

Mr. Robert V. Carton argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent-cross-appellant (Messrs. Carton, Nary, Witt & Arvanitis, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Albert Hindle, Jr. brought an action in the Superior Court, Law Division, against defendant Morrison Steel Co. (Morrison) to recover damages resulting from a breach of his employment contract and his contractual rights under the company's retirement fund agreement. Plaintiff also sued to recover punitive and compensatory damages in a tort action based on an alleged conspiracy by Samuel Hamelsky...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases