1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 31 Wis.2d
  5. 31 Wis.2d 134 (1966)
 

MERKLEY v. SCHRAMM

31 Wis.2d 134 (1966)

MERKLEY, Appellant, v. SCHRAMM and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 13, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Edward Rudolph of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Maxine Schramm there was a brief by Kluwin, Dunphy, Hankin & Hayes of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Bernard J. Hankin.

For the respondent Richard Schramm there was oral argument by Dean S. Cady of Milwaukee.

WILKIE, J.

To begin with it is necessary to consider appellant's contention that the trial court did not comply with the provisions of sec. 270.33, Stats.,1 in that he did not render and file his decision on the cause within the sixty-day period prescribed by the statute. Although the court's decision dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Richard Schramm was made directly from the bench at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases