ONEY v. NEEDHAM

No. 39893.

6 Ohio St. 2d 154 (1966)

ONEY, APPELLANT, v. NEEDHAM, A MINOR, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 11, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James C. Britt, Mr. Joseph S. Deutschle, Jr., and Mr. Roy J. Gilliland, for appellant.

Messrs. Wiles, Doucher, Tressler & Martin, Mr. Paul Martin and Mr. Thomas H. Monger, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

The omission to charge specifically on proximate cause was not called to the trial court's attention, nor was the court requested to charge thereon. Such an error of omission did not justify the reversal by the Court of Appeals. Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases