PEOPLE v. NAPPI


18 N.Y.2d 136 (1966)

The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Joseph C. Nappi, Jr., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 7, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Vincent Cerrito, District Attorney (Howard A. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

William P. Willig and Richard E. Roberts for respondent.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur.


VAN VOORHIS, J.

The People argue that the court below erred in holding that subdivision (c) of section 1180 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was unconstitutionally vague and indefinite; that the evidence was legally sufficient to prove defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and so created a question of fact; and that this court has jurisdiction to reverse the court below and order a new trial.

The County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases