IN RE SADLOCH


48 N.J. 92 (1966)

222 A.2d 761

IN THE MATTER OF EMIL J. SADLOCH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 10, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bennett H. Fishler, Jr. argued the cause for the order.

Mr. Arthur J. Messineo argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Messineo & Messineo, of counsel).


The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, a member of the bar since 1930, admitted the allegations of a complaint before the Bergen County Ethics and Grievance Committee that he had misappropriated funds paid to him by the administrator of an estate of which his clients were legatees. It further appeared that subsequent counsel for the legatees had made several attempts to collect the funds owing from respondent, but had received only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases