1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 31 Wis.2d
  5. 31 Wis.2d 106 (1966)
 

PARENT v. STATE

31 Wis.2d 106 (1966)

PARENT, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Van Susteren, Bollenbeck, Patterson, Froehlich & Jensen and Edward R. Bollenbeck, all of Appleton, and oral argument by Edward R. Bollenbeck.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

WILKIE, J.

The sole issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion3 in denying the writ of coram nobis.

The attorney general argues that the trial court could not be guilty of an abuse of discretion in this case for the reason that the only basis for Parent's petition below (intoxication as a mitigating factor in sentencing) is different than the ground urged on this review (intoxication as a complete defense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases