1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 363 F.2d
  5. 363 F.2d 1002 (1966)
 

ARTVALE, INC. v. RUGBY FABRICS CORP.

No. 398, Docket 29239.

363 F.2d 1002 (1966)

ARTVALE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. RUGBY FABRICS CORP. and Barmil Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided July 15, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay H. Topkis, New York City (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City; Sidney S. Rosdeitcher on brief, Emanuel R. Posnack, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant-respondent.

James N. Buckner, New York City (Brumbaugh, Free, Graves & Donohue, New York City, Joseph D. Garon, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-respondents-appellants.

Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

Artvale, Inc., plaintiff in an action for patent infringement in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, appeals from Judge Levet's dismissal of the complaint as barred by a settlement agreement, 232 F.Supp. 814 (1964). Defendants cross-appeal from the dismissal of their counterclaim for damages for plaintiff's breach of a covenant not to sue therein contained. A previous appeal in related...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases