1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 98 (1966)
 

FROMM & SICHEL, INC., v. RAY'S BROOKFIELD, INC.

33 Wis.2d 98 (1966)

FROMM & SICHEL, INC., Appellant, v. RAY'S BROOKFIELD, INC., and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 29, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, and oral argument by John U. Schmid, Jr., all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Francis X. Krembs of Milwaukee.

HEFFERNAN, J.

This court has previously upheld the constitutionality of portions of sec. 133.25, Stats., the "Fair Trade Act." Ed. Schuster & Co. v. Steffes (1941), 237 Wis. 41, 295 N. W. 737; Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co. (1937), 225 Wis. 474, 274 N. W. 426; Bulova Watch Co. v. Anderson (1955), 270 Wis. 21, 70 N.W.2d 243. At oral argument the defendants stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases