BRISTOW v. SELMAN

No. A-11521.

406 S.W.2d 896 (1966)

E. L. BRISTOW et al., Petitioners, v. R. E. SELMAN et ux., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

October 5, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tom Steele, Linden, for petitioners.

Spruiell, Lowry, Potter, Lasater & Guinn, Tyler, for respondents.


ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co., 135 Tex. 503, 144 S.W.2d 878, the Court of Civil Appeals has held that the one-eighth of the royalty reserved by Mrs. A. Mae Weeden et al. in their deed to Austin and Bristow must be carved out of the one-fourth mineral interest reserved by Austin and Bristow in their deed to R. E. Selman. 402 S.W.2d 520. We are in agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases