JOHNSON v. SMITH

No. 40893.

416 P.2d 884 (1966)

William D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. H.T. SMITH, Defendant in Error, and Cross-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 5, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wallace & Bickford, by Wilson Wallace, Ardmore, for plaintiff in error.

George & George, Ardmore, for defendant in error.


PER CURIAM.

Two issues are presented for our determination, which are:

(1) Does the filing of a cross-petition in error invoke the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to consider the specifications of error therein asserted if cross-petitioner did not file a motion for a new trial?

We answer this issue in the negative and dismiss the cross-petition in error.

(2) If P sues D for an accounting arising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases