1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 357 F.2d
  5. 357 F.2d 921 (1966)
 

CAR-TWO, INC. v. CITY OF DAYTON

No. 16265.

357 F.2d 921 (1966)

CAR-TWO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DAYTON et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul H. Granzow and Charles P. Pfarrer, Dayton, Ohio (Turner, Wells, Granzow & Spayd, by Paul H. Granzow, Cowden, Pfarrer, Crew & Becker, by Charles P. Pfarrer, Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

W. Erwin Kilpatrick, Dayton, Ohio (Herbert S. Beane, City Atty., W. Erwin Kilpatrick, Asst. City Atty., Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.

Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In carrying out the objectives of an urban renewal area, designated by the City of Dayton as the "Central Business District Urban Renewal Area," which consists, in part, of the condemnation of more than fifty acres of land in the central business district of the City of Dayton, the City excluded from condemnation thirteen parcels of property.

Appellant owned a parcel of property which was condemned for such area. Appellant filed a complaint against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases