1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 250 F.Supp.
  5. 250 F.Supp. 1011 (1966)
 

BRAMLETT v. ARTHUR MURRAY, INCORPORATED

Civ. A. No. 4716.

250 F.Supp. 1011 (1966)

Jesse A. BRAMLETT and Gertrude R. Bramlett, Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR MURRAY, INCORPORATED, a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court D. South Carolina, Greenville Division.

February 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rodney A. Culbertson, Greenville, S. C., for plaintiff.

Rufus M. Ward, Spartanburg, S. C., Michael G. Plumides, Plumides & Plumides, Charlotte, N. C., for defendant.

SIMONS, District Judge.

Defendant Arthur Murray, Inc. has appeared specially to move to quash the attempted service of process on it, and to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction upon grounds that: (1) Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is not domesticated in the state of South Carolina; (2) Defendant is not now, nor has it ever been, doing business in South Carolina so as to make it amenable to the jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases