1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 248 F.Supp.
  5. 248 F.Supp. 1008 (1966)
 

IN RE CERTAIN CARRIERS REP. BY E., W. & S.E. CAR. CONF. COM.

Misc. No. 41-63; Civ. A. No. 2643-65.

248 F.Supp. 1008 (1966)

In re CERTAIN CARRIERS REPRESENTED BY the EASTERN, WESTERN AND SOUTHEASTERN CARRIERS CONFERENCE COMMITTEES, etc. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (LINES EAST), et al., Defendants.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

January 12, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton Kramer, Washington, D. C., John H. Haley, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., and David L. Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., for employees.

Francis M. Shea and Richard T. Conway, Washington, D. C., for carriers.

Paul A. Sweeney, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., for United States, intervenor.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This proceeding is an outgrowth of the arbitration directed by the Congress in respect to issues that brought this country to the brink of a nationwide railroad strike in August, 1963. The Court has before it a petition on the part of a group of railway employees, to impeach what may be called a supplemental award of the special Arbitration Board created by the Congress. This award consists of answers to questions submitted to the Board in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases