1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 409 S.W.2d
  5. 409 S.W.2d 838 (1966)
 

HOUSTON FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. DIETER

No. A-11569.

409 S.W.2d 838 (1966)

HOUSTON FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Harold G. DIETER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

December 31, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evans, Pharr, Trout & Jones, Charles B. Jones and Carlton B. Dodson, Lubbock, for petitioner.

Huffaker & Green, Harold Green, Tahoka, for respondent.

STEAKLEY, Justice.

This is an agreed workmen's compensation case submitted in accordance with Rule 262, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner is the compensation carrier; Respondent is the injured employee and claimant. The one question presented for decision is whether Petitioner, who had not invoked the provisions of Section 12e of Article 83061, was entitled in the trial of the case to make proof of the possible beneficial

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases