ESPINOZA v. TINSLEY

No. 21419.

409 P.2d 835 (1966)

John Max ESPINOZA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Harry C. TINSLEY, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, In Department.

January 17, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger M. Breyfogle, Canon City, for plaintiff in error.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendant in error.


SCHAUER, Justice.

Plaintiff in error will be referred to as petitioner, or by name, and defendant in error Tinsley, who was the warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary, will be referred to as the respondent.

This is the second time the issues herein involved have been before this court, each writ of error having been directed to an order of the district court, before whom three petitions were filed, which denied Espinoza's petition for writ of habeas corpus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases