Milton C. HONSEY, Connie Burchett, Harold H. Hoffmann, Donald L. Huber, Clark MacGregor, Glenn G. C. Olson, Stanley W. Olson, Richard J. Parish and Kenneth Wolfe, Plaintiffs,
v.
Joseph L. DONOVAN, Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, Eugene A. Monick, Auditor of Ramsey County, Minnesota, Robert F. Fitzsimmons, Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, Kenneth W. Campbell, Auditor of Anoka County, Minnesota, Carl D. Onischuk, Auditor of Dakota County, Minnesota, Individually as Auditors of their Respective Counties and as Representatives of all County Auditors of the State of Minnesota, Defendants,
and
Donald Sinclair, Rudolph Hanson, William C. Novosad, A. P. Lofgren, Charles Cheney, Richard C. Bergan, S. W. Rodekuhr, Martin L. Vanseth, and David G. Kankel, Intervening Defendants.
United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 14, 1966.
January 14, 1966.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Howard, Peterson, LeFevere, Lefler & Hamilton, Clayton L. LeFevere, Vernon E. Bergstrom, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs.
William B. Randall, Ramsey Co. Atty., Thomas M. Quayle, Asst. Ramsey Co. Atty., St. Paul, Minn., Geo. M. Scott, Hennepin Co. Atty., John Harvey, Asst. Hennepin Co. Atty., Earl Cudd, Sol. Gen., John F. Casey, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Robt. W. Johnson, Anoka Co. Atty., J. Jerome Kluck, Dakota Co. Atty., for Eugene Monick.
Gordon Rosenmeier and John E. Simonett, Little Falls, Minn., for intervenors Sinclair and Hanson.
Brink & Sobolik by Lyman A. Brink, Hallock, Minn., for Lofgren, Cheney, Bergan, Rodekuhr, Vanseth and Kankel.
Scott & Miller, Gaylord, Minn., for Novosad.
Philip Neville, Minneapolis, Minn., for Thuet, Cina, Grittner, Latz, Knudsen and Mann, intervenors.
Mandt Torrison, St. Paul, Minn., pro se as an intervenor.
Before BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge, DEVITT, Chief District Judge, and NORDBYE, District Judge.
United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.
PER CURIAM.
We are asked by the plaintiffs to assert our retained jurisdiction in this reapportionment case and go forward with preliminary plans for the establishment of Minnesota legislative districts for the 1966 elections.
Previously, on December 4, 1964, we held the then Minnesota legislative apportionment law to be unconstitutional. D.C., 236 F.Supp. 8. We recognized that the 1965 regular session of the Minnesota...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
