1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 245 Cal.App.2d
  5. 245 Cal.App.2d 976 (1966)
 

BECK v. ARTHUR MURRAY, INC.

Docket No. 28935.

245 Cal.App.2d 976 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 328

ALICE M. BECK, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARTHUR MURRAY, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

October 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, John J. Hanson and John H. Sharer for Defendant and Appellant.

W.D. Allison for Plaintiff and Respondent.

KINGSLEY, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether or not the trial court properly held defendant Arthur Murray, Inc. liable in damages, as provided by section 1812.94 of the Civil Code, for a violation by its licensee of the provisions of the Dance Act (Civ. Code, §§ 1812.80-1812.95).

Stating the facts most favorably to respondent, as we are required to do on this appeal, the following seem to be clear: Defendant Arthur Murray, Inc. (hereinafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases